For the record, these functions include the operational management of the Internet root zone, the assignment of IP address blocks and AS numbers to Regional Internet Registries (RIR), and the coordination of Internet protocols with IETF.
In its response, Afnic recalled that the transition process should concern the oversight of IANA functions as a whole, not just the root zone record management function, as ICANN seemed to suggest. Furthermore, Afnic recalled that the US government had an agreement with Verisign for publishing changes in the Internet root zone, and that the agreement, although not explicitly referred to in the NTIA statement, should be discussed during the process.
Afnic expressed its attachment to a secure and reliable Internet, and suggested using the results of the São Paulo meeting to ensure that the transition leads to a robust, sustainable mechanism, where each and everyone’s responsibilities are ensured by outside, independent audits and assessments. Afnic believes that this recommendation applies to all of the stakeholders involved in the operational management of the Internet root zone, which includes ICANN.
Finally, Afnic agreed with the need to promptly implement a steering group for this process, in order to coordinate and summarize worldwide contributions. However, it opposed the approval of members of the group by the ICANN Board, and recalled that all of the stakeholders, in particular national registries in charge of country-code internet TLDs, had their own coordination mechanisms, and were represented by their regional organizations (CENTR, for Afnic and its European counterparts, which also published a contribution [PDF file]) and CCNSO for ICANN itself.
Afnic’s contribution will be submitted for discussion during a special Consultative Committee meeting, open to all, on May 26.