Actualités Actualités

ADR trends, the results of Afnic resolution procedures - Q1 2015

Home > Observatory and resources > News > ADR trends, the results of Afnic resolution procedures - Q1 2015
03/06/2015

“Alternative Dispute Resolution” procedures (ADR) are an out-of-court method available to rights holders who consider that a third party has infringed their rights by filing a domain name or using it in a way that is detrimental to them.

A dispute resolution system called Syreli has been available since 2011 for the domains managed by Afnic (.fr, .re, .yt, .wf, .tf and .pm).

In 2012, after the first year of use of this procedure, Afnic published the first assessment of Syreli trends, constituting a wealth of information for anyone who wanted to understand how the process was managed, identify the key steps in the review procedure, determine the best way to present a case file or use supporting documents, and easily find benchmark decisions.

Beginning this year, Afnic has improved its offer. The frequency of the review is now quarterly and it has been renamed: “Syreli Trends” is now “ADR trends”, ahead of the upcoming launch of the new Afnic alternative dispute resolution procedure called PARL Expert. Ultimately the document will summarize both Afnic procedures, Syreli and PARL Expert.

Download ADR Trends

The figures to note from the first review for 2015 are as follows:

  • Since its establishment in 2011, Syreli has resulted in 609 decisions.
  • In 58% of the cases, the motion requested by the applicant was accepted: 90% of domain name transfer requests, 10% of domain name deletion requests.
  • Only 0.5% of Syreli decisions have been subject to judicial review, the results of which are not yet known.

The document also provides an opportunity to learn more about the various principles underlying decisions such as:

  • the grounds for the claim;
  • the completeness of the claim file;
  • the validity of the claimant’s reason for acting;
  • the legitimate interest of the holder;
  • with the benchmark decisions opposite each principle.

More information